<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Do&#8217;s and Dont&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.startupscotland.co.uk/internet-marketing/twitter-dos-and-donts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.startupscotland.co.uk/internet-marketing/twitter-dos-and-donts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.startupscotland.co.uk/internet-marketing/twitter-dos-and-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottishbusinessblog.co.uk/?p=584#comment-355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see a way round those annoying urls you end up with when you post a link to something. I guess it prevents long titles but they look crazy!

I&#039;ll only tweet if it adds value and provides helpful information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see a way round those annoying urls you end up with when you post a link to something. I guess it prevents long titles but they look crazy!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll only tweet if it adds value and provides helpful information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Hynd</title>
		<link>http://www.startupscotland.co.uk/internet-marketing/twitter-dos-and-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Hynd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottishbusinessblog.co.uk/?p=584#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Great comments Jill!

Does your approach to Twitter differ much from what I have suggested? It&#039;s interesting to hear what tactics other people employ to get some value out of Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments Jill!</p>
<p>Does your approach to Twitter differ much from what I have suggested? It&#8217;s interesting to hear what tactics other people employ to get some value out of Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.startupscotland.co.uk/internet-marketing/twitter-dos-and-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottishbusinessblog.co.uk/?p=584#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Very interesting points. One point I&#039;d like to make about using Twitter through your website -

Developing your &#039;widget&#039; directly from twitter gives you a customised &#039;button&#039; that I&#039;ve found slow to load. I&#039;ve found that using your own url in a third party widget maker gives you a faster feed - and therefore a faster user experience for your visitors.
Maybe it&#039;s a Flash issue.

I&#039;ve found this on my pc. Others, maybe mac users, may have different opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting points. One point I&#8217;d like to make about using Twitter through your website -</p>
<p>Developing your &#8216;widget&#8217; directly from twitter gives you a customised &#8216;button&#8217; that I&#8217;ve found slow to load. I&#8217;ve found that using your own url in a third party widget maker gives you a faster feed &#8211; and therefore a faster user experience for your visitors.<br />
Maybe it&#8217;s a Flash issue.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found this on my pc. Others, maybe mac users, may have different opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

